Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Will Obama Keep His Promise Today? I hope not.

We are only a moments away from the inauguration of President Barack Obama. During the campaign, Barack Obama left little doubt where he stands on the issue of abortion. Now that he is about to be sworn in, will he continue to be so stridently pro-abortion?

On the campaign trail, Barack Obama told the American people exactly what his first act as president would be:

"The first thing I'd do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That's the first thing that I'd do."

-- Senator Barack Obama, speaking to the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, July 17, 2007

The Freedom of Choice Act is truly an insidious piece of legislation. It would basically invalidate every single restriction on abortion in every U.S. state - even those that the Supreme Court of the United States previously found consistent with Roe v. Wade.

The Freedom of Choice Act would invalidate all parental notification laws, waiting period laws, and all requirements for full disclosure of the physical and emotional risks of having an abortion.

It would also overturn the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, and it would deny the right of religiously-based hospitals to refuse to perform abortions.

So that is what Barack Obama would accomplish.

On his first day.

Since 1973, more than 40 MILLION innocent babies have been chopped up and slaughtered in the American abortion mills.

What the United States has done is beyond imagination. The reality is that we have dissected our babies, burned them alive, sucked their brains out and yet the American people seem to care about this issue less than ever.

How far down the toilet have we gone as a society when we kill about a million babies a year, and nobody even gets upset about it anymore?

Is there any hope?

Is there any chance that Barack Obama could change his mind?

Well, Barack Obama is so rabidly pro-abortion that he even voted AGAINST a bill that would have provided medical care for infants that survived an abortion procedure. Even Hillary Clinton was not in favor of that.

For a full examination of what Obama believes regarding abortion watch the following video.....

Let's take a really quick look at one very cruel method of abortion which the Freedom of Choice Act would once again legalize.....

Five steps to a partial birth abortion:

1) Guided by ultrasound, the abortionist grabs the baby's legs with forceps.

2) The baby's leg is pulled out into the birth canal.

3) The abortionist delivers the baby's entire body, except for the head.

4) The abortionist jams scissors into the baby's skull. The scissors are then opened to enlarge the skull.

5) The scissors are removed and a suction catheter is inserted. The child's brains are sucked out, causing the skull to collapse. The dead baby is then removed.

America must wake up while it still can.

This is a tragedy of unprecedented magnitude that cannot be ignored. Do you really think God will let us get away with this forever? Repent America!!


Anonymous said...

What do you plan to do with the babies that aren't aborted. The parents aren't ready for them, do you want them raised in a home that doesn't love or want them. Or maybe placing them in an already overloaded foster system is your plan, where they can be shipped from house to house. You would probably complain about higher taxes, which would be needed to be implemented in order to pay for the health care and government overhead for the foster kids. Those against abortion never have a plan for what will happen if they got their way.

What about the women's right? What if she was raped? Does that matter to you? Incest? Probably not because "God" might not be happy with you. And that's my last issue with your argument. Pro life people always bring god into it, NOT EVERY ONE BELIEVES IN GOD. If you opened your eyes you would see all the holes in the belief in a god.

America isn't only for the religious, others live hear too, accept it!

Anonymous said...

Are you really so ignorant?

FACT: There are more people who want to adopt babies than there are babies. That is why it costs thousands and takes years.

People who do not want babies should not have sex. When you bring a life into the world you are responsible for it until you legally give that responsibility away.

We don't need a plan for what would happen without abortion. We did just fine for nearly 200 years without it as a nation.

1/3 of all pregnancies have been terminated since 1973. If there were 1/3 more people they would now be adults helping pay taxes and support the ecconomy.

In fact part of the problem with social security is our largest generation (baby boomers) killed 1/3 of their kids and so they are not there to pay into social security. The system will fail by 2018. The problem with you abortionists is you are killing off the people who should be funding your socialist utopia.

Where the Hell does it say that a woman has a right to kill her baby in her womb? The Bible? The constitution? NO! What about my right to shoot you in the head? Do we just make up rights? Do we just pull them out of our butts? NO! Rights are for protecting the innocent not liberating the murderer. You are an idiot.

If someone rapes you at my house when I am not home does that give you the right to burn my house down because my house reminds you of the rape?

Just because an innocent baby reminds you of a rape doesn't give you the right to murder it. Moron! How selfish. You were raped so now you can murder? Crazy! Rape is horrible and rapists should be castrated but the baby is innocent life. You are sick. You are freakin sick to want to kill a baby!

People bring God into it because that is their belief and their right. Just like its your right to leave God out. However, there are a lot of people who don't believe in God but still think taking a human life is wrong.

You have the freedom to say what you want. They have the freedom to say what they want. But NO ONE should have the freedom to take innocent life. The right to life is the core right and freedom. It's what all freedoms are to protect.

America is for the religious. America is for the non-religious. I BELIEVE NON-BELIEVERS HAVE THE RIGHT TO LIFE FREE. That is why I know abortion is wrong. All babies are unbelievers. All babies are unreligious. And they have the right to live and not have their brains sucked out in their mothers wombs.

I don't know how baby killers sleep at night.

Anonymous said...

Fact: quote your sources. Oh maybe that doesn't apply when you make things up.

Here's a few foster care FACTS for you and unlike you I'll give my source. "adoptioninstititue.org"

-"1999 statistics (latest year totals finalized) there were 581,000 children in foster care in the United States. Twenty-two percent of these children-about 127,000 kids - were available for adoption.

-"the number of children waiting for adoption on Sept. 30, 1999 was more than two-and-a-half times the number of children adopted druing that year." 127,000 waiting children: 46,000 children adopted.

-"of the 46,000 foster children adopted in 1999 half waited less than one year for adoption after their birth parents rights were terminated, and nearly half waited a year or more. Six percent waited three to four years."

So your argument that we don't need a plan is just stupid. Do you think as soon as the kid is born it is adopted by someone. Take another look at the statistics above. Where are all these people wanting to adopt you talked about? It's that kind of thinking, that we don't need a plan, all will be okay that gets us into trouble. Maybe you should talk to someone who works close to foster care or a child protective services agent for a better perspective, and maybe you will realize that we are unprepared if pro-life gets its way.

The 1/3 bit is ridiculous. Completely hypothetical but if you really want to go there, fine. If there was the 1/3 extra people here now there would also be that many more people now who are unemployed. Do you imagine all these people being employed. Fantasy world. Those 1/3 extra people would have solved everything, good argument(that was sarcastic, have to make sure you get that).

Now to another one of your points. The so called argument about being able to burn your house down after a rape. That is just stupid! First of all a person could easily make it so they don't see the house again but if the victim is pregnant that's not so easy to miss. Can't believe you can even compare the two. You would force a women to carry to term rather than let her take a morning after pill and prevent the extra psychological stress of carrying a child conceived out of rape. Force a mother to carry an unwanted child for a whole term than terminate a fertizlized egg?

Even with all this arguments for abortion you will still say we are killing innocent life. You can't say when life begins. Zygote? One month? Heart beats? Brain waves?

"Nearly all abortions take place in the first trimester, when a fetus cannot exist independent of the mother. As it is attached by the placenta and umbilical cord, its health is dependent on her health, and cannot be regarded as a separate entity as it cannot exist outside her womb" ("womensissues.about.com")

Since the fetus is so dependent on the mother don't you think the mother should have a say in what happens.

Maybe you should try to show some empathy to a living person than to an undeveloped one.

The Patriot said...

Everyone is welcome to debate the facts on here and freely disagree but please keep the tone more civil and watch the language. Maybe we should do away with anonymous posting.

Anonymous said...

Hi, i am a 20 year old woman with a two year old daughter and a baby on the way. When i was 16, i became pregnant, i did not consent to this pregnancy. i was in school, with no means of providing for my child (not even enough for food and nappies etc) i lived off of mummy and daddy.
apart from this my health was put at risk because i was so young. I went to a few appointments with doctors etc and i decided to abort the baby at 6 weeks.

Are you trying to say that i as the mother should have no right to abort my baby because it was an innocent life? what life? it wasnt formed (looked like a baked bean) no brain waves or heart beat) and i would have to give birth to a baby (if it survived because of my health issues) which i couldnt look after/bring up appropriately, and put myself at risk??
I might sound selfish but my health is more important than a 6week old fetus. I am now a proud mother of a two year old which i can afford to have, feed and give an education to.

yes there are many people wanting to adopt have you ever thought that having so many children for adoption and it costing thousands doesnt help. i know of people who would do anything to adopt a child as they cannot concieve themselves but cannot afford the costs that adoption entails. how many more people are there who want to adopt and cannot due to expences.

you should try forgetting about your pro life plan and concentrate on helping those INNOCENT children who are already in this world find appropriate homes where they will be loved and cared for. and help those willing parents fund the costs of having a child!